A second, in Jackson, which provides only medication abortion, is closing this week because of high rent and other costs. The Casper clinic opened in April, after a nearly yearlong delay because of damage from an arson attack. The state has just one clinic that provides abortions with both medication and surgery. The state's high court this week also heard arguments from lawyers for some lawmakers who oppose abortion rights and Right to Life Wyoming who are seeking to join in the defense of the bans alongside the state attorney general. Owens didn't immediately make a decision after Thursday's arguments. Any ruling from her would likely be appealed to the Wyoming Supreme Court. Justices have not indicated when they'll rule.Ī judge heard arguments Thursday on whether to decide now on Wyoming's abortion bans or let a challenge to the laws go to trial in the spring.Ĭhallenges to laws banning abortion at all stages of pregnancy and the nation's first explicit prohibition on use of medication to end pregnancy are before Teton County District Judge Melissa Owens, who has blocked the laws from being enforced while they are disputed in court.Īdvocates on both sides have asked Owens to rule based on the law rather than holding a trial that's scheduled to start in April. The state supreme court heard arguments Wednesday on whether they have the right to do so. Michelle Lujan Grisham earlier this year signed a bill that overrides local restrictions that were adopted in Lea and Roosevelt counties and the cities of Hobbs and Clovis. Three of them received abortions and one delivered a stillborn baby.Īfter Ohio's ban on abortions after cardiac activity can be detected - generally at six weeks' gestation and before women often know they're pregnant - took effect last year, abortion providers sued to have it struck down, arguing it violated the state constitution.īut some conservative city and county governments have passed their own restrictions. The plaintiffs all wanted to end pregnancies in which doctors told them they were likely to have miscarriages or deliver babies who would likely die soon after birth.Īll four of them traveled to Oregon or Washington. The plaintiffs said the opposite: That these are real situations facing doctors now - and the vagueness is harming women. The state contended that the case should move ahead because it was based on hypothetical future scenarios. The women are not seeking to overturn the entire abortion ban but rather to clarify how exceptions to save the lives of pregnant women should be applied. ![]() Like lawsuits in Tennessee and Texas, the plaintiffs are women who could not get abortions in their states despite pregnancies that had serious health risks for them, their fetuses or both.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |